The Cost of Anti-Homeless Laws Just Went Up by $1.9 Billion

HUD just added a high cost to the growing federal pressures against cities that criminalize homelessness. Cities that enforce anti-homeless laws risk losing $1.9 billion nationwide from federal homelessness funding. For the first time HUD is asking applicants to “describe how they are reducing criminalization of homelessness.”

by the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty

On September 18, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) added to the growing federal pressure against criminalization of homelessness by giving incentives for communities to take steps to end criminalization in its $1.9 billion grant program for federal homelessness funding.

HUD’s new requirement for federal homelessness funding follows on the heels of the Department of Justice’s announcement in August that criminalizing individuals for being homeless is unconstitutional.

Every two years, HUD issues its Notice of Funding Availability to local Continuums of Care (local partnerships of public and private agencies that address homelessness in a given geographic area).

In this year’s application for $1.9 billion in federal funds, for the first time HUD is asking Continuums to “describe how they are reducing criminalization of homelessness.”

In the extremely competitive funding process, Continuums’ ability to fully respond to this question can determine up to two points in the funding application, and in many cases could be the difference between receiving funding or not.

“We welcome the federal government’s direction of limited tax dollars to the places that will most effectively use that money to address homelessness,” said Maria Foscarinis, executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty.

“The federal government cannot sustainably meet its goals of ending veteran’s homelessness this year, chronic homelessness next year, and all homelessness by 2020 if communities continue to waste scarce tax dollars on failed policies that perpetuate homelessness.”

The Law Center has published multiple reports on the criminalization of homelessness, including No Safe Place, which showcased the dramatic increase in criminalization in the past few years, as well as case studies of communities engaging in constructive alternatives.

The No Safe Place Advocacy Manual shows that when criminalization ordinances are challenged in court, most often they are struck down.

The Law Center has also garnered condemnation of criminalization as cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment by the United Nations’ Human Rights Committee, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, and Human Rights Council, which made specific recommendations to the federal government to adopt funding incentives to abolish the practice.

This question on the Continuum of Care’s funding application is the first step in implementing those recommendations.

“They who have little are thought to have no right to anything.” Art by David Adams

“Criminalization of homelessness is already more expensive than providing housing, but those costs — from keeping people in jail to increased emergency room visits — are often hidden,” said Eric Tars, senior attorney at the Law Center.

“We hope HUD’s new question on their funding application brings at least one cost — the cost of lost federal dollars coming into the community — into full view. When added to the potential costs of losing litigation, there’s really no reason for communities to ignore the overwhelming data that shows housing is more effective than criminalization.”

“The Law Center is happy to provide technical assistance to communities in reviewing their policies to conform with the Department of Justice brief and HUD incentives,” said Tars. “We hope many communities will take advantage of this opportunity to reverse and eliminate these harmful, unconstitutional practices.”

The National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty (www.nlchp.org) is dedicated to using the power of the law to prevent and end homelessness.

Writing for the Street Spirit: My 17 Year Journey

Writing for Street Spirit has awakened in me a sense of responsibility toward others. Street Spirit is a way for people silenced by big money and big media to have a voice.

Animal Friends: A Saving Grace for Homeless People

“I wrapped her in my jacket and promised I’d never let anybody hurt her again. And that’s my promise to her for the rest of her life. In my mind she’s a little angel that saved me as much as I saved her.”

A Testament to Street Spirit’s Justice Journalism

The game was rigged against the poor, but I will always relish the fact that Street Spirit took on the Oakland mayor and city council for their perverse assault on homeless recyclers. For me, that was hallowed ground. I will never regret the fact that we did not surrender that ground.

Tragic Death of Oakland Tenant Mary Jesus

Being evicted felt like the end of her life. As a disabled woman, she saw nothing ahead but a destitute life on the streets. She told a friend, “If I’m evicted tomorrow, I have no choice but to kill myself. I have no resources, no savings, no money, and nowhere to go.”

They Left Him to Die Like a Tramp on the Street

Life is sacred. It is not just an economic statistic when someone suffers and dies on the streets of our nation. It is some mother’s son, or daughter. It is a human being made in the image of God. It is a desecration of the sacred when that life is torn down.

Joy in the Midst of Sorrow in Santa Maria Orphanage

This amazing priest not only housed 300 orphaned children from the streets of Mexico City, but he also took care of 20 homeless elders in his own house and started a home for children dying of AIDS. Father Norman also ran a soup kitchen that fed many people in the village.