Sidestepping Democracy: A Berkeley Tradition Lives On

The anti-panhandling law, the anti-sitting law, the two-square-feet-of-possessions-only law, and the proposal to equip the smoke-free downtown with ashtrays have one thing in common: the Downtown Berkeley Association. This unelected group was given a free hand in crafting contradictory and unconstitutional legislation.

Commentary by Carol Denney

The anti-panhandling law, the anti-sitting law, the two-square-feet-of-possessions-only law, and the recent proposal to equip the smoke-free area of downtown Berkeley with ashtrays have one thing in common: the Downtown Berkeley Association.

This unelected group was given a free hand in crafting often contradictory and unconstitutional legislation over the decades, burdening the city with serious court costs and targeted individuals much more.

Why? Why would an unelected, ill-informed group of property owners, many of whom don’t live in Berkeley, be given a free hand to craft self-serving, often discriminatory legislation without objection from the City Council? The answer can be found in any analysis of campaign electoral financing; in Berkeley, the candidate with the biggest donors usually wins the race.

Has the election of a new, “progressive” council majority, including new Mayor Jesse Arreguin, changed the tendency to sidestep democracy? Not at all, as observers of a recent Berkeley City Council meeting had clarified when the mayor and his alliance overruled a vote by the Board of Library Trustees for a qualified candidate and instead situated a candidate of his own choosing, proving you can be technically elected and still lose the race if you’re not part of the mayor’s political in-crowd.

The Downtown Berkeley Association (DBA) continues to have no embarrassment about its role in supporting mean-spirited legislation targeting the poor, and never misses an opportunity to lobby on its behalf, even hiring homeless clients of Options Recovery Services to hand out misleading slate fliers, handing out more than $5,000 in $100 and $50 cash payments just before the 2012 election and failing to report expenditures, a practice DBA CEO John Caner admitted to in 2013 and for which he was fined.

Mayor Arreguin was a sitting council representative for District Four at the time, and called Caner’s actions “outrageous,” stating “you’re paying people to take their rights away. It’s unacceptable.”

But “not acceptable” is what he called Councilmember Susan Wengraf’s plaintive objection to situating his own preference on the Board of Library Trustees in violation of decades of respecting the historical independence of the library’s trustees and their right to choose and elect their own candidates.

“Restricted Area: Wealthy People Only.”

 

Berkeley voters who assume the new “progressive” majority won’t play the same role in supporting policies which predominately target the poor should watch the council closely, especially after the absurd fanfare for the all-hat-and-no-cattle “Pathways Project” which leaves anti-poor laws intact and offers no permanent housing.

And if you get the chance, ask the fresh, new council representatives why the DBA’s legislative suggestions are always fast-tracked to the council instead of making the rounds of relevant citizen commissions. If they give you a bland answer that the DBA “represents downtown,” watch your back.

Society’s Failure to Care Is the Root of Homelessness

In one of the richest places in the world, people become so wrapped up in their own comfort and status that they don’t care about the human beings they are stepping over.

Visionary Art of Leon Kennedy

In Leon Kennedy’s painting, his living friends are portrayed next to long-gone elders and assassinated civil rights leaders. Even death does not shatter the bonds of love and community.

Welcome to Homelessness

The worst thing about homelessness, I sensed, would have nothing to do with bad weather, hunger or sleep deprivation. It would be the way I soon would be cast out like a leper, as though one would contract a deadly disease just from being in my presence.

Big Money Spends a Fortune to Fight Rent Control

Wealthy landlords, realtors and developers have teamed up and are spending a fortune to fight the efforts of renters to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Act, the law that severely limits the rent control options of California cities. Tenants have also launched rent control campaigns in 10 California cities.

Vicious and Cruel Assault on the Poorest of the Poor

Elected leaders of the national tenants union denounced the housing bill proposed by HUD Secretary Ben Carson as a vicious and cruel assault on the poorest of the poor. “Millions will be displaced if these deeply cruel proposals see the light of day. Congress should reject them out of hand.”

The DBA’s Assault on Free Speech in Berkeley

The DBA launched a new poster destruction policy, despite being warned it was unconstitutional by the City Attorney. Tearing down fliers is a textbook example of a free speech violation. No one has the right to make content-based distinctions about what is allowed to be posted or said in legal, public places.