Instead of Positive Change, It’s Déjà Vu All Over Again

Positive Change boxes in Berkeley are merely repeating a failed model from the past. Cities that have adopted these programs as a model have all ended them for the same reason: They simply don’t work. Voucher programs get brassy press coverage until they fail, and then they fail in quiet obscurity.

by Carol Denney

The “Berkeley Cares” voucher program was launched in 1992. The vouchers came in designations of 25 cents and theoretically could be used for grocery, laundry and transportation expenses. The purchase of alcohol and cigarettes was prohibited.

The public was supposed to buy them at participating merchant stores or the Health and Human Services Department and hand them to panhandlers instead of real money.

Except that lots of stores wouldn’t take them and redeeming them through the city was a pain. Cash drawers and counters had no space for them or their explanatory displays. The vouchers themselves were flimsier than real money, tore easily, and were hard to manage since each one was only worth a quarter.

Cities that adopted “Berkeley Cares” vouchers as a model have all ended their programs for the same reason Berkeley did: It didn’t work.

My favorite “Berkeley Cares” moment came when the University of California’s Milton Fuji arranged a presentation on “Berkeley Cares” for a southside neighborhood coalition and asked a local homeless woman to explain the program to the group.

The woman was gracious, clear in her presentation, and thorough enough to mention that she couldn’t seem to get stores to honor the vouchers for diapers for her child, or formula. As she listed the many things she couldn’t use vouchers for — basic things which any mother might need — Fuji’s face went bright red.

What she unintentionally made clear in her presentation that day was what everybody eventually and quietly agreed by ending the program: nothing works like money.

Voucher programs get brassy New York Times coverage until they fail, and when they fail, they fail in quiet obscurity. The big brass band has gone home.

The Downtown Berkeley Association is still reeling from the viral video of one of its “ambassadors” beating up a homeless man while another “ambassador” offered no objection.

But it apparently still thinks it is the best steward of four cash boxes planted around downtown, the keys to which will no doubt be in the pockets of the same “ambassadors” whose training video didn’t manage to clarify to them that they can’t just beat people up.

John Caner stands next to his Positive Change box on the pole. Caner has been instrumental in developing anti-homeless laws in Berkeley.  Carol Denney photo

John Caner stands next to the small red Positive Change box on the pole. Caner, the CEO of the DBA, has been instrumental in developing anti-homeless laws in Berkeley. Carol Denney photo

 

The Downtown Berkeley Association’s CEO, John Caner, neglected to mention in his press release that San Diego, one of the cities mentioned in his press release as also having “Positive Change” boxes, has committed to Housing First as a strategy.

Housing First—San Diego is a three-year homelessness action plan developed by the San Diego Homeless Commission in November 2014.

Housing First—San Diego plans to renovate the the historical Hotel Churchill to create 72 affordable studios for homeless veterans and youth aging out of the foster care system. It will also award $30 million over the next three years to create permanent supportive housing that will remain affordable for 55 years.

The San Diego plan will also commit 1,500 federal housing rental vouchers and invest up to $15 million from the federal “Moving to Work” program to provide housing for homeless individuals and families. Finally, it will dedicate 25 units of the Homeless Commission’s own units to provide transitional apartments for homeless individuals and families.

The success of San Diego’s commitment to ending homelessness, if it comes, may have a little more to do with the programs listed above than the spare change from “Positive Change” cash boxes as filtered through the dubious hands of the Downtown Berkeley Association.

Tags: ,

Writing for the Street Spirit: My 17 Year Journey

Writing for Street Spirit has awakened in me a sense of responsibility toward others. Street Spirit is a way for people silenced by big money and big media to have a voice.

Animal Friends: A Saving Grace for Homeless People

“I wrapped her in my jacket and promised I’d never let anybody hurt her again. And that’s my promise to her for the rest of her life. In my mind she’s a little angel that saved me as much as I saved her.”

A Testament to Street Spirit’s Justice Journalism

The game was rigged against the poor, but I will always relish the fact that Street Spirit took on the Oakland mayor and city council for their perverse assault on homeless recyclers. For me, that was hallowed ground. I will never regret the fact that we did not surrender that ground.

Tragic Death of Oakland Tenant Mary Jesus

Being evicted felt like the end of her life. As a disabled woman, she saw nothing ahead but a destitute life on the streets. She told a friend, “If I’m evicted tomorrow, I have no choice but to kill myself. I have no resources, no savings, no money, and nowhere to go.”

They Left Him to Die Like a Tramp on the Street

Life is sacred. It is not just an economic statistic when someone suffers and dies on the streets of our nation. It is some mother’s son, or daughter. It is a human being made in the image of God. It is a desecration of the sacred when that life is torn down.

Joy in the Midst of Sorrow in Santa Maria Orphanage

This amazing priest not only housed 300 orphaned children from the streets of Mexico City, but he also took care of 20 homeless elders in his own house and started a home for children dying of AIDS. Father Norman also ran a soup kitchen that fed many people in the village.