Eureka Police Viciously Beat Homeless Man, Leave Him to Die in Jail

After the police beat an unarmed homeless man to death, a jury awarded $4,575,000 to his five-year-old daughter and father. Police officers kicked him, battered him with a baton and pepper-sprayed him. They kneed his organs and pounded his skull on the concrete, then refused to give him medical care.

by Verbena Lea


EUREKA, Calif. — A jury delivered a resounding victory for a homeless man killed by Eureka police officers, awarding the total sum of $4,575,000 to his five-year-old daughter and father, the plaintiffs in a police misconduct civil rights case.

The jury in the court case ruled against the City of Eureka and Eureka Police Officers Adam Laird, Justin Winkle, and Gary Whitmer for the death of Martin Cotton II. Punitive damages were assessed against the three officers.

Cotton, a 26-year-old homeless man living on the streets, died of blunt-force head trauma. The plaintiffs, represented by attorneys Dale K. Galipo and Vicki I. Sarmiento of Los Angeles County, were Cotton’s daughter and his father.

The jury found that Officers Laird and Winkle used excessive force, and that the officers failed to provide medical care.

On August 9, 2007, Eureka Police Officers Winkle, Laird, Whitmer, and five others were involved in beating the unarmed Martin Cotton II to death. In broad daylight, officers pummeled Cotton’s head and body, then brought him to jail, failing to seek medical assistance.

Expert testimony presented by the plaintiffs established that timely medical care would have saved Cotton’s life. He died in the jail cell within two hours. A painful video of Cotton dying in jail was presented during the trial.

The fatal beating of Cotton occurred outside the Eureka Rescue Mission. Police were dispatched to the Mission for a disturbance involving Cotton. When they arrived, Cotton was no longer in the Mission and was alone and defenseless.

Laird and Winkle claim they ordered him to put his hands behind his back and he did not move. Both officers pepper-sprayed him. Officer Winkle kneed him in the ribs and forced him to the ground, where the officers beat him.

Cotton made no moves against the police and remained prone on the concrete. Officer Whitmer, the third officer on the scene, gave a running kick to Cotton, battered him with a baton, and pepper-sprayed him. More officers arrived and joined in the beating.

The trial of Siehna Cotton et al v. City of Eureka included police readily admitting that they sat on Cotton, forced his head onto the concrete throughout the beating, kicked him, hit him with a metal baton, kneed at his vulnerable organs, deployed pepper spray three times, and did not seek medical assistance for him.

The officers, however, denied hitting Cotton on the head, most likely because blunt-force head trauma was determined to be the cause of death.

Crucial testimony came from two civilian witnesses who bravely reported that they had indeed seen at least Officer Winkle pounding on Cotton’s skull multiple times on the concrete. One witness said he heard “fist-to-skull” and “bone-on-bone” noises from those head strikes.

“Report Police Crimes.” Artwork by Doug Minkler

The verdict was announced on Sept. 23, 2011, after a two-week trial in Federal Court in Oakland. Siehna Cotton, his daughter, was awarded $1,250,000 for the pain her father suffered and $2,750,000 for wrongful death damages. Marty Cotton Sr. was awarded $500,000, which required plaintiffs to show that the officers’ actions “shocked the conscience.”

The jury also found that the police officers acted with “malice, oppression, or reckless disregard” to the decedent’s or plaintiffs’ rights, and assessed punitive damages of $30,000 from Officer Winkle, $30,000 from Officer Laird, and $15,000 from Officer Whitmer.

Cotton was one of many people killed by police in the Humboldt region from the fall of 2005 to the fall of 2007. Attorney Vicki Sarmiento said she hopes the verdict sends shock waves to other officers who may consider committing such atrocities. “We don’t want this to happen to anyone else,” she said. “We as a community, we as a society, cannot tolerate it.”

Sarmiento said of the victory, “The jury’s decision showed respect for Martin Cotton’s life. They acknowledge the wrong that occurred and acknowledge that Martin’s life had value. The issue of human dignity and humanity is what this is about, and everyone has a right to have that.”


Verbena Lea is a member of Redwood Curtain CopWatch. To visit their click here

Tags: , , , ,

Society’s Failure to Care Is the Root of Homelessness

In one of the richest places in the world, people become so wrapped up in their own comfort and status that they don’t care about the human beings they are stepping over.

Visionary Art of Leon Kennedy

In Leon Kennedy’s painting, his living friends are portrayed next to long-gone elders and assassinated civil rights leaders. Even death does not shatter the bonds of love and community.

Welcome to Homelessness

The worst thing about homelessness, I sensed, would have nothing to do with bad weather, hunger or sleep deprivation. It would be the way I soon would be cast out like a leper, as though one would contract a deadly disease just from being in my presence.

Big Money Spends a Fortune to Fight Rent Control

Wealthy landlords, realtors and developers have teamed up and are spending a fortune to fight the efforts of renters to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Act, the law that severely limits the rent control options of California cities. Tenants have also launched rent control campaigns in 10 California cities.

Vicious and Cruel Assault on the Poorest of the Poor

Elected leaders of the national tenants union denounced the housing bill proposed by HUD Secretary Ben Carson as a vicious and cruel assault on the poorest of the poor. “Millions will be displaced if these deeply cruel proposals see the light of day. Congress should reject them out of hand.”

The DBA’s Assault on Free Speech in Berkeley

The DBA launched a new poster destruction policy, despite being warned it was unconstitutional by the City Attorney. Tearing down fliers is a textbook example of a free speech violation. No one has the right to make content-based distinctions about what is allowed to be posted or said in legal, public places.